DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No. 07617-12
S November 2012
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
TOs Secretary of the Navy
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1610 PERS~-32 of
26 Sept 2012
(3) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 811/356 of
3 Oct 2012
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to change his Performance Mark
Average (PMA) from 3.60 to 3.80 for the March 2012 advancement
examination cycle.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Ruskin, Exnicios, and George
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on
S November 2012, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the
Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosures (2) and (3), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s
application has commented to the effect that Petitioner’s request
warrants relief extending only to changing PMA _ for the
September 2011 examination cycle. Any later date is not warranted for
the reasons stated in enclosures (2) and (3).
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the
Docket No. 07617-12
existence of an injustice warranting the following partial corrective
action.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, as
follows:
a. Petitioner's Performance Mark Average (PMA) is changed to 3.80
for the September 2011 advancement examination cycle.
b. That so much of Petitioner’s request for corrective action as
exceeds the foregoing be denied for the reasons set forth in
enclosures (2) and (3).
c. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed Lm
Petitioner’s naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
For Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the
Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
he above ,ntitled
complete record of the Board's proceedings in
matter. ys fy
Y fy -
LLM /)
JONATHAN S. RUSKIN DAVID j/J. SH
Recorder Acta Recorder
Bi Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the
Navy.
5S November 2012
pen (Az
/V/W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06149-11
06149220 22 August 2011 i From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 August 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06156-12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the “special” enlisted performance evaluation report for 14 May to 31 August 2011 submitted by NAVMEDTRACEN Fort Sam Houston (copy at Tab A) and filing in its place the “special” report for the same period submitted by NAVHOSP BREMERTON (copy in enclosure (1)). The Board, consisting...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6491 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by modifying the enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 June 2010 to 15 June 2011 {copy at Tab A) to change the rate from YN3 (pay grade B-4) to YN2 (pay grade E-5). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6859 14
1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments {2} Naval Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 8112/0254 - of 13 Aug 2014 i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7570 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was entitled to a Performance Mark Average (PMA) score of 3.80 vice 3.73 for a Passed but Not Advanced (PNA) point of .5 for the September 2011 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Ruskin and Midboe, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 October 2014 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6811 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advancement to a higher grade. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error an injustice on 10 Mare . of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11416-08
11416-08 9 October 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : ‘REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: © (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by revising the enlisted performance’ evaluation report for 21 August 2007 to 15 March 2008 (copy at “Tab A). That any material directed to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2970 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that her Performance Mark Average (PMA) for the September 2011 Navy-wide advancement exam cycle 212 should have been 3.8 vice 3.7. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07181-08
07181-08 12 September 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hess, Pfeiffer and Zsaliman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 11 September 2008, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That his record be corrected further by changing his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07145-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show a performance mark average (PMA) of "4.0" vice "3.9" and a final multiple of "175.35" vice "169.35" on the advancement profile sheet for advancement to MU2 (pay grade E-5) from the Cycle 195 March 2007 examination; and that his MU2 effective date and time in rate date, 16 January 2008 and...